Month: May 2004

  • "O my Father, thou that dwellest
    In the high and glorious place,
    When shall I regain thy presence
    And again behold thy face?
    In thy holy habitation,
    Did my spirit once reside?
    In my first primeval childhood
    Was I nurtured near thy side?

    For a wise and glorious purpose
    Thou hast placed me here on earth
    And withheld the recollection
    Of my former friends and birth;
    Yet ofttimes a secret something
    Whispered, “You’re a stranger here,”
    And I felt that I had wandered
    From a more exalted sphere.

    I had learned to call thee Father,
    Thru thy Spirit from on high,
    But, until the key of knowledge
    Was restored, I knew not why.
    In the heav’ns are parents single?
    No, the thought makes reason stare!
    Truth is reason; truth eternal
    Tells me I’ve a mother there.

    When I leave this frail existence,
    When I lay this mortal by,
    Father, Mother, may I meet you
    In your royal courts on high?
    Then, at length, when I’ve completed
    All you sent me forth to do,
    With your mutual approbation
    Let me come and dwell with you."

    (Eliza R. Snow)

    Romans 8:16-17
    Acts 17:28-29

    And since I feel like taking a risk and being slightly controversial right now, here's a message from Elder Boyd K. Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. I edited it for length, a full version is available here. I may need to change this post, we'll see what happens.

    Boyd K. Packer, “The Pattern of Our Parentage,” Ensign, Nov. 1984, 66
    . . . I desire to share a few thoughts about a basic doctrine of the Church.

    What I say is based on these convictions:

    First: instruction vital to our salvation is not hidden in an obscure verse or phrase in the scriptures. To the contrary, essential truths are repeated over and over again.

    Second: every verse, whether oft-quoted or obscure, must be measured against other verses. There are complementary and tempering teachings in the scriptures which bring a balanced knowledge of truth.

    Next: there is a consistency in what the Lord says and what He does, that is evident in all creation. Nature can teach valuable lessons about spiritual and doctrinal matters . . .

    Fourth: not all that God has said is in the Bible. Other scriptures—the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price—have equal validity, and they sustain one another.

    Fifth: while much must be taken on faith alone, there is individual revelation through which we may know the truth. “There is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.” (Job 32:8.) What may be obscure in the scriptures can be made plain through the gift of the Holy Ghost. We can have as full an understanding of spiritual things as we are willing to earn.

    And I add one more conviction: there is an adversary who has his own channels of spiritual communication. He confuses the careless and prompts those who serve him to devise deceptive, counterfeit doctrine, carefully contrived to appear genuine.

    I mention this because now, as always, there are self-appointed spokesmen who scoff at what we believe and misrepresent what we teach. . .
    The doctrine I wish to discuss concerns the nature of man and of God.

    There is a question in both the Old and the New Testaments: “What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?” (Ps. 8:4; see also Heb. 2:5-7.)

    The answer is taught most simply in the song . . . [I am a Child of God]:

    I am a child of God,
    And He has sent me here,
    Has given me an earthly home
    With parents kind and dear. …

    I am a child of God,
    Rich blessings are in store;
    If I but learn to do his will
    I’ll live with him once more.
    (Sing with Me, B-76.)

    Those lyrics teach a basic doctrine of the Church. We are the children of God. That doctrine is not hidden away in an obscure verse. It is taught over and over again in scripture. These clear examples are from the Bible:

    “All of you are children of the most High.” (Ps. 82:6.)

    And: “We are the offspring of God.” (Acts 17:29.)

    Doctrinal truths are interrelated. There is an old saying that if you pick up one end of a stick, you pick up the other end as well.

    If you concede that we are His children, you must allow that God is our Father.

    That, too, is repeated over and over again in the scriptures. There are so many references that I could not even begin to read them to you . . .
    God is addressed universally in the Christian world as Father. Were we not commanded to pray “Our Father which art in heaven”? (Matt. 6:9.)

    You may respond, “Every Christian knows that.” Perhaps every Christian does, but so-called Christians, with the help of clergymen, belittle in most unchristian ways our teaching that we are the literal sons and daughters of God.

    Other ideals flow from that great truth. Once you know that, you know that all men are brothers. That realization changes you. Thereafter you cannot willingly injure another. You could not transgress against them in any way.

    That simple, profound doctrine is worth knowing for another reason as well. It brings a feeling of self-worth, dignity, self-respect. Then self-pity and depression fade away. We then can yield to the discipline of a loving Father and accept even the very hard lessons of life.

    Christ taught us to be “perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matt. 5:48), to take on His attributes, to follow the pattern of our parentage.

    A little girl taught me a profound lesson on this subject. Surely you are not above learning from little children. Much of what I know that really matters I have learned from being a father.

    Some years ago I returned home to find our little children were waiting in the driveway. They had discovered some newly hatched chicks under the manger in the barn. When they reached for them, a protective hen rebuffed them. So they came for reinforcements.

    I soon gathered a handful of little chicks for them to see and touch.

    As our little girl held one of them, I said in a teasing way, “That will make a nice watchdog when it grows up, won’t it?” She looked at me quizzically, as if I didn’t know much.

    So I changed my approach: “It won’t be a watchdog, will it?” She shook her head, “No, Daddy.” Then I added, “It will be a nice riding horse.”

    She wrinkled up her nose and gave me that “Oh, Dad!” look. For even a four-year-old knows that a chick will not be a dog, nor a horse, nor even a turkey. It will be a chicken. It will follow the pattern of its parentage. She knew that without having had a course in genetics, without a lesson or a lecture. . .
    In the countless billions of opportunities in the reproduction of living things, one kind does not beget another. If a species ever does cross, the offspring cannot reproduce. The pattern for all life is the pattern of the parentage. . .

    Since every living thing follows the pattern of its parentage, are we to suppose that God had some other strange pattern in mind for His offspring? Surely we, His children, are not, in the language of science, a different species than He is?

    What is in error, then, when we use the term Godhood to describe the ultimate destiny of mankind? We may now be young in our progression—juvenile, even infantile, compared with Him. Nevertheless, in the eternities to come, if we are worthy, we may be like unto Him, enter His presence, “see as [we] are seen, and know as [we] are known,” and receive a “fulness.” (D&C 76:94.)

    This doctrine is not at variance with the scriptures. Nevertheless, it is easy to understand why some Christians reject it, because it introduces the possibility that man may achieve Godhood.

    Their concern centers on certain verses of scripture, for there are many references (at least twenty in the Bible alone) which speak of one God. For example, Eph. 4:6: There is “one God and Father of all.”

    But if you hold strictly to a too rigid interpretation of those verses, you create serious theological problems for yourself.

    There are many other verses of scripture, at least an equal number in the Bible, that speak in plural terms of “lords” and “gods.” The first chapter of Genesis states:

    “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.” (Gen. 1:26; italics added.)

    Such references are found from Genesis to Revelation. (See Rev. 1:6.)

    The strongest one was given by Christ Himself when He quoted that very clear verse from the Eighty-second Psalm:

    “Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? [See Ps. 82:6.]
    “If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
    “Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God?” (John 10:34-36; italics added.)

    The acceptance of this truth does not mean accepting the multiple gods of mythology nor the polytheism of the pagans, which was so roundly condemned by Isaiah and the other prophets.

    There is one God, the Father of all. This we accept as fundamental doctrine.

    There is only one Redeemer, Mediator, Savior. This we know.

    There is one Holy Ghost, a personage of spirit, who completes the Godhead.

    I have emphasized the word one, in each sentence, but I have used it three times. Three is plural.

    Paul used the plural many and the singular one in the same verse:

    “For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)
    “But to us there is but one God, the Father.” (1 Cor. 8:5-6.)

    Anyone who believes and teaches of God the Father, and accepts the divinity of Christ, and of the Holy Ghost, teaches a plurality of Gods.

    When the early Apostles were gone, those who assumed the leadership of the Church forsook revelation and relied on reason. The idea of three separate Gods offended them, for it appeared to contravene those scriptures which refer to one God.

    To reconcile that problem, they took verses here and there and ignored all else that bears on the subject. They tried to stir the three ones together into some mysterious kind of a composite one. They came up with creeds which cannot be squared with the scriptures. And they were left with a philosophy which opposes all we know of creation, of the laws of nature. And that, interestingly enough, defies the very reason upon which they came to depend.

    The Apostle Paul understood this doctrine and wrote to the Philippians:

    “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
    “Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God.” (Philip. 2:5-6.) . . .

    We did not invent this doctrine. Much of it was preserved in the Bible as it was revealed to prophets in ancient times. And as they foretold, further light and knowledge was revealed.

    With the restoration of the fulness of the gospel came the Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ. Other revelations were given and continue to be given, and verses which seemed to oppose one another have harmony. . .

    The Father is the one true God. This thing is certain: no one will ever ascend above Him; no one will ever replace Him. Nor will anything ever change the relationship that we, His literal offspring, have with Him. He is Eloheim, the Father. He is God. Of Him there is only one. We revere our Father and our God; we worship Him.

    There is only one Christ, one Redeemer. We accept the divinity of the Only Begotten Son of God in the flesh. We accept the promise that we may become joint heirs with Him. Paul wrote to the Romans:

    “The spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:
    “And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ” (Rom. 8:16-17.)

    There are those who mock our beliefs in the most uncharitable ways. And we will bear what they do with long-suffering, for it does not change truth. And in their own way they move our work along a little faster. We will send our missionaries abroad to teach that we are the literal sons and daughters of God.

    We will strive with every exertion to teach what Christ taught, to live as He lived, to endure as He endured.

    We began with this question: “What is man that thou art mindful of him?” Christ, our Redeemer, our Elder Brother, asked, “What manner of men ought ye to be?” And then He answered, “Verily I say unto you, even as I am.” (3 Ne. 27:27.)

    I bear solemn witness that Jesus is the Christ, the Only Begotten of the Father in the flesh; that He is our Redeemer, our Savior; that God is our Father. This we know through the gift of the Holy Ghost. And I humbly but resolutely affirm that we will not, we cannot, stray from this doctrine. On this fundamental truth we will never yield! In the name of Jesus Christ, amen.

  • Woah . . . .total epiphany moment (shhh! I'm epiphinating)

    Was driving in the car listening to music, like "Anthem of our dying day" that has a really cool gasp in it that fits the week wonderfully . . . and I got to the "Best of Me."

    Rewind. Last summer I would sit on cloudy days at work bored listening to the radio for new songs that would make me really excited. "Best of Me" by starting line was one such brand new song on Q101 and I really like it, so I wrote some of the lyrics that intriqued me down on the back of the sign in sheet so I could look it up later. I wrote "and we whisper, 'say what you're thinking out loud'". I looked up the song and downloaded it and have listened to it since off and on never again thinking about its lyrics. Until

    driving in the car listening to music I suddenly realized that in listening to it I was misunderstanding one of the lines grammatically. And all of a sudden I figured it out. and then I listened to the lyrics. And then bang. Epiphany. I went biserk in the car and it was insane.

    And then I got speckeled lemonade with Heather.

    "The worst is over; you can have the best of me."

  • A.P. Stats over.

    I really want to get a hold of the Calling's "Our Lives" . . . it's a really good song.

    Anyway, I burned a CD. Some favorites, some pop, some alternative, and some underground . . .

    Two Points For Honesty (Guster)
    Come On (Ben Jelen)
    100 Years (Five for Fighting)
    It Comes to This (Straylight Run)
    Tension and Terror (Straylight Run)
    As Lovers Go (Dashboard Confessional)
    I'll Change For Now (Never Heard of It)
    Goodbye (Never Heard of It)
    Anthem of Our Dying Day (Story of the Year)
    Until the Day I Die (Story of the Year)
    Best Of Me (Starting Line)
    Ocean Avenue (Yellowcard)
    That's the Girl (Blessid Union of Souls)
    Jude Law And A Semester Abroad (Brand New)
    Last Chance to Lose Your Keys (Brand New)
    Jaded (Mest)
    Flavor Of The Week (American Hi-Fi)
    In This Diary (The Ataris)
    I'd do Anything (Simple Plan)
    Addicted (Simple Plan)
    Memory (Sugarcult)
    Blinded (Third Eye Blind)
    Again I go Unnoticed (Dashboard Confessional)

  • AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    A.P. Statistics test tomorrow.

    You know it's bad when In Stake Conference the speaker talks about Stats. Yesterday one of the area authorities was talking about tests that prove various outcomes. For example, it you wanted to find out if drug x was effective against a certain disease, then you would gather a random simple sample from a population. You would randomly select half to get a treatment, drug x, and half to get a control, or placebo. To be really accurate you would include double blindness and replication in the experiment. If the people taking the drug do better than those with the placebo, it'd be a good idea to use that drug.

    Apparently God conducted an experiment to prove to men that the scriptures are effective against moral disease. God took a random simple sample from the anciet Hebrew population in Jerusalem, around 600 B.C. They were separated randomly into two groups. The first group was Lehi and his family. After leaving the city, they were told by God to back into Jerusalem to get the Brass Plates (scriptures) from Laban. Then they went to the promised land and became a mighty civilization. The second group later became known as the Mulekites. Mulek was the son of King Zedekiah who escaped the genocide of Zedekiah's family. He escaped Jerusalem and ended up in the promised land, but he brought no scriptures. After a few hundred years, Mulek's descendents were not only morally corupt, but they had forgotten the language and religion of their fathers. Since it is obvious that scriptures did make the people who used them better off, we can conclude that it'd be a good idea to use them.

    Random Sample - Control vs. Treatment randomly assigned - Data compared

    It's sheer statics, will probably be one of the essay questions on the AP test tomorrow, and I learned it first from the Book of Mormon. Go figure.

  • Update.

    It's been an insanely busy two weeks, I would go so far as to say the climax of Senior year, and really the climax of high school.

    Thursday, April 22, was Mr. SHS: The Bachelor. 17 Seniors competed for the title. The contest included a dance, beach wear, formal wear, and a talent. It was so much fun to put on and to be a part of, and I'm so glad I was one of the contestants. It really was a great crowd; I could hear many people shouting my name and various things about me. My favorite was Erin Feinerman's "Danny is my Favorite Mormon!" I could hear her over all the rest.

    Tuesday, April 27, was the opening of the A.P. Art Show. I had been waiting for that night since 8th grade. I will put pictures up as soon as I get them. It was honestly one of the best nights of my life.

    Monday I set up the show, which was absolutely insane. Tuesday it was open all day, which was fun. I had a book for people to sign, and I got the nicest comments. Thank you everyone who left me a note!

    Tuesday night I got all dressed up and got there early. As soon as the reception started I was bombarded with people. It was amazing. Ms. Goldman, my first art teacher whom I hadn't seen since 4th grade came. My entire youth group came. People from the ward came. Heather came. Friends came. Neighbors came. It cerainly was quite the night. I was very exhausted, but it was so wonderful.

    My show featured 7 pieces ranging in medias from colored pencil to paint. The show stopper was the 99"x54" oil painting called Hosanna:Parting the Veil. I wish you all could have been there to see it.

    Now that it's over, I am really sad. I almost don't know what to do with myself, but I'm still too busy. I had to take down the show Thursday, and then this past weekend Jonathan spent with us. We're still awaiting our verdict.

    Tomorrow I teach Seminary, which I'm excited to do since it's on the Book of Daniel. I can't wait to dive into chapter 10 . . . .

    then A.P. tests, Prom, Graduation, Work Work Work, BYU.